About Hibbs Bridge
Hibbs Bridge is a double-arched stone bridge with a humped back built between 1810 and 1830 when the Snickers Gap Turnpike was being constructed on what is now the Snickersville Turnpike.

This 22′ wide bridge passes over Beaverdam Creek and was originally named Beaverdam Bridge.
In 1857 the Hibbs family purchased the land adjoining the bridge and the bridge was renamed Hibbs Bridge.
The Hibbs family operated mills on Beaverdam Creek. During the Civil War two of the Hibbs sons enlisted in the Confederate army and one son, a blacksmith, rode with Mosby’s Partisan Rangers. The Union forces reportedly used the Hibbs residence as a Union headquarters. This would have been ironic since a resident of that house rode at night with Mosby’s Rangers on raids against the Union forces.
In 1864 the Union General Philip Sheridan ordered that his men should “destroy all forage and subsistence, burn all barns and mills and their contents, and drive off all the stock in the region.” This action was to starve the Southern army, which depended on Loudoun County and the Shenandoah Valley for their sustenance.
At that time one of the Hibbs family mills was destroyed, but Hibbs Bridge was spared. Hibbs family members continued to live at the bridge until the early 1940’s. In 1943 the property was sold at public auction to the Altizer family who still live at Hibbs Bridge.
A descendent of the Hibbs family, Evelyn Thockmorton, whose great grandmother was Mary Hibbs still resides in Winchester, VA. Please read her comments.
Evelyn Throckmorton discussing Hibbs Bridge:
“A longtime Supporter, I want it to be known that I am personally grateful and indebted to the Loudoun County Supervisors, Eleanore Towe, James Burton and [former chairman] Dale Polen Myers, as well as the many members of the Snickersville Turnpike Association who have worked so tirelessly to save the historic Hibbs Bridge, built circa 1820.
Towe’s comment, “We want the turnpike to be kept winding, narrow and calm” is indeed historically appropriate and what we want. Further, Mr. Burton’s assertion “We really don’t intend for this to be a commuter road” is precisely our sentiment and intention.
Polen’s reiteration of the suggestion to ban trucks from the bridge entirely is a simplistic solution to what has become an inexcusable and expensive ‘brouhaha’. The crux of the solution is to ban any vehicles from the span which would endanger its structural integrity.
The Hibbs family, for whom the bridge is named are my forebears. Mary Hibbs was my Great-grandmother. Major William Hibbs was one of the three early recruits who formed the nucleus of the 43rd Virginia Partisan Cavalry Regiment, a detachment of General Jeb Stuart’s Virginia Cavalry Division.
The 43rd was commanded by John Singleton Mosby, who refined ranger and guerrilla warfare to the military art it has become today. Henry Hibbs, age 20 and William’s son, also rode with Mosby. Both men were distinguished in their service, bravery, and resourcefulness.
Needless to say, all of the above indicates my strong familial and sentimental link to this lovely historic area of Loudoun, the Snickersville Turnpike, and Hibbs Bridge. I resent deeply the idea that one of Loudoun County’s true historic treasures would ever fall prey to the wrecker’s ball and be replaced by an ugly concrete span.”
Respectfully, Evelyn Throckmorton (4 November 1996)

Hibbs Bridge Preservation Efforts
In 1994 the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) announced that they had plans to replace Hibbs Bridge, which they deemed was unsafe and inadequate for modern transportation needs. Their plans called for a 425 foot bridge to be built 65 feet downstream. One alternative was a lower bridge 40 feet downstream. The cost of the bridge replacement was $1.5 million, which did not include the costs necessary to shift and raise the road 65 feet to approach a new higher bridge.
At that time the Snickersville Turnpike Association had been formed to protest VDOT’S proposed “improvement” plans for the Snickersville Turnpike which would have realigned the road, widened it to 22 feet paved, with 6 foot gravel shoulders and in the process removed all the historic stone walls and mature trees.
A door-to-door survey of all the property owners on the entire length of the turnpike was conducted. This survey included VDOT’s plans for Hibbs Bridge. Of the 230 property owners personally contacted 99% opposed VDOT’s plans for the bridge as well as VDOT’s proposed plans for the Snickersville Turnpike itself. Not only did the citizens oppose VDOT’s plans for Hibbs Bridge, but the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and local State Delegates also opposed it.
In September 1994, all 47 speakers at a public hearing unanimously stated that they wanted Hibbs Bridge to stay in service and be rehabilitated without changing it. Under intense and persistent public pressure and with the support of the citizens and elected representatives, VDOT abandoned this plan but then in 1996 offered an alternate plan.
The alternate plan was to demolish Hibbs Bridge, build a 28 foot-wide level concrete structure, and adhere the original bridge stones to the outside of the concrete “to preserve the bridge’s historic character”.
This was a plan which they said in 1994 was not feasible because “to attempt to modify the existing structure in any way except to perform maintenance would adversely affect its historic value”. Now, however, two years later, adhering the original stones from Hibbs Bridge to a new concrete bridge would “preserve the historic value” of the bridge. This is totalitarian doublespeak at its finest.
Before this plan was announced, the Snickersville Turnpike Association had hired Mr. Abba Lichtenstein, a nationally known and respected expert on masonry-arch bridges, to inspect and assess the condition of Hibbs Bridge.
He reported that Hibbs Bridge could be restored with its current dimensions and be serviceable for another 50 years. He also affirmed that the bridge was in no danger of falling down, something VDOT had stated at the public hearing in September of 1994.
Mr. Lichtenstein’s report concluded “I found Hibbs Bridge to be in good condition and well-maintained and suggest that minimal repair is required to keep it in good operating condition under prevailing traffic conditions. Should these change, options are available to strengthen the bridge within historic preservation guidelines.”
It is obvious that VDOT ‘s plan to demolish the bridge and re-glue the remaining stones onto a concrete bridge would not be compatible with the standards for historic structures as issued by the Secretary of the Interior.
A public hearing was scheduled for November of 1996 concerning these new plans for Hibbs Bridge. The weekend before the public hearing a group of citizens decorated the bridge with red, white and blue bunting, lined the approaches to the bridge with American flags and played patriotic music.
When people stopped to ask what was going on they were presented with a petition to sign that affirmed that the citizens and people who used the road wanted to “Save Hibbs Bridge”. Even the police officer that came to find out if these citizens were obstructing traffic on Hibbs Bridge signed the petition.